Thomas Schacht, Ph.D. Concludes Father’s Parental Alienation

Thomas Schacht, Ph.D., forensic psychologist and professional witness testimony on parental alienation claims in a Tennessee custody case.

McClain v. McClain

[This case was originally briefed in this blog in 2018, but we wanted a deeper dive here about the forensic psychology testimony.]

The mother and father on this Tennessee case had been divorced in 2001, and the courtroom entered a parenting plan for his or her two kids.  There have been some modifications over time, and as of 2009, the daddy was named main residential father or mother with 268 days of parenting time.  At a while thereafter, the mom relocated to Texas.  In 2015, the mom made a movement to change custody, and she or he pointed to varied alleged violations of the 2009 order.

The events had been finally capable of come to phrases, and agreed to a brand new parenting plan.  The daddy was nonetheless main residential father or mother, and the mom was granted 85 days of parenting time, most of which might be exercised in Texas.  When the mom alleged extra violations by the daddy, the trial courtroom ordered an evaluation by a forensic psychologist.

The mom had alleged that the daddy had begun denying in-person and phone contact with the youngsters, and had failed in his obligations to deliver the youngsters to counseling classes.

Dr. Thomas Schacht, Forensic Psychologist. Click on to see his testimony from a televised prison trial, accessible on YouTube.

The forensic psychologist appointed by the trial courtroom was Thomas Schacht, Ph.D., and he was directed to conduct “full psychological testing” of the mother and father and the older little one.  Dr. Schacht’s report concluded that the youngsters had been “alienated from their mom, not justifiably estranged, and the alienation seems to be supported by the actions and statements of others, together with at the least their father and paternal grandmother.”

He had based mostly this conclusion upon evaluate of information and different supplies, similar to textual content messages, in addition to interviews with the mother and father, kids, academics, and principal.  One of many textual content messages was from the older little one to the mom by which he referred to the mom as “devil” and expressed his opinion that he would sometime see “each of you burning beneath.”  He later testified that by “each of you,” he meant his mom and maternal grandmother.  He concluded the textual content by stating that he hoped his mom loved her final trip along with her favourite little one, particularly, the youthful one.

Dr. Schacht had additionally famous suicidal ideation by each kids, however concluded that these had been pushed principally to manage outcomes, versus true expressions of a need to harm themselves.

The mom had been identified with bipolar dysfunction, and the daddy had expressed to the older little one his view that psychological sickness was a “religious downside.”  Dr. Schacht acknowledged his opinion that this affect was a possible danger to the youngsters in the event that they had been affected by a psychological sickness sooner or later.

Primarily based upon Dr. Schacht’s testimony, the trial courtroom concluded that there had been a “extreme” case of parental alienation.  Dr. Schacht had had proposed 4 choices for coping with this alienation.  The primary was to easily grant the daddy unique custody with no visitation by the mom, which amounted to preserving the established order.  The second possibility was to maintain the daddy as main residential father or mother, however with efforts to treatment the alienation.  The third possibility was to put the youngsters in a impartial setting away from each mother and father.  The ultimate possibility was to call the mom as main residential father or mother and droop all contact with the daddy till the youngsters demonstrated progress of their relationship with their mom.

For that fourth possibility, Dr. Schacht had beneficial a workshop named Household Bridges in California.  The trial courtroom felt that this might be the most suitable choice.  Because the father had the larger revenue, he was to be answerable for two-thirds of the price of Household Bridges.

The mom was named the first residential father or mother with sole decision-making authority.  The daddy was to haven’t any contact with the youngsters for at the least 90 days, beginning with the graduation of the Household Bridges Workshop.  His future parenting time was to be contingent upon compliance with workshop tips.

The older little one turned 18 in 2016, and the orders regarding him had been to haven’t any impact after that point.

The daddy finally appealed to the Tennessee Court docket of Appeals.  On the problem of change of custody, the appeals courtroom famous that parental alienation is a growth that constitutes a “materials change of circumstances,” warranting a change.

The appeals courtroom agreed with the decrease courtroom that the proof, significantly Dr. Schacht’s report, supported the decrease courtroom’s discovering that there had been a extreme case of parental alienation in opposition to the mom by the daddy and paternal grandmother.  The decrease courtroom had discovered, and the appeals courtroom agreed, that each events had alternative to current info to Dr. Schacht, and that he was not lacking any very important info.

The appeals courtroom identified that the decrease courtroom had discovered Dr. Schacht’s testimony to be very credible, however that the daddy’s testimony typically consisted of maximum damaging generalizations concerning the mom.

Dr. Schacht concluded that the alienation of the youngsters from the mom had reached “disaster proportions,” and the appeals courtroom agreed with this characterization.

For these causes, the appeals courtroom agreed that there had been a cloth change of circumstances, and it went on to conclude that the change of custody, coupled with the Household Bridges Workshop, was within the kids’s finest curiosity.

539 S.W.3d 170 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017).

See unique opinion for precise language.  Authorized citations omitted.

To be taught extra, see Little one Custody Legal guidelines in Tennessee and our video, How is little one custody decided in Tennessee?

See additionally Tennessee Parenting Plans and Child Support Worksheets: Building a Constructive Future for Your Family that includes examples of parenting plans and little one help worksheets from actual circumstances accessible on