The advantages of fantasy fiction and imaginative play

Fantasy has historical roots, but it surely will get a foul rap. Some fear that fantasy fiction could confuse younger kids. Others dismiss fantasy as foolish or frivolous. Ought to children avoid fantasy play and fantasy leisure? Is studying fantasy fiction a waste of time? Quite the opposite! However research counsel we should always take a nuanced method to fantasy — one which considers a toddler’s private and developmental traits.

little girl, wearing a superhero cape, is standing on a hill, looking down at a city.

Some forms of fantasy could also be too scary — or too cognitively taxing — for preschoolers to comply with. But younger kids are fairly savvy concerning the fantasy parts in fiction. They’re fast to establish them as unattainable. And analysis signifies that fantasy fiction and fantasy play can profit children. Participating with fantasy can stimulate creativity and enhance vocabulary. It might assist some kids develop higher self-regulation expertise. It would even improve their working reminiscence efficiency, and — underneath some situations — assist them uncover inventive options to issues.

So let’s check out the proof — the way in which kids reply to improbable tales and imaginative play.

Not so simply confused: Preschoolers perceive that fantasy eventualities can’t occur in actual life.

We frequently hear that younger kids can’t inform the distinction between fantasy and actuality. However is it true? Not likely. Not if what we imply is one thing like “preschoolers are liable to suppose that Spiderman exists as a result of they’ve seen him in books or on tv.” In fact, preschoolers do make some errors of judgment, however not on this course. 

Most younger kids are literally hyper-skeptical. 

For instance, Andrew Shtluman and Susan Carey introduced four-year-olds with a sequence of occasions in an illustrated storybook. Then they requested the kids to guage whether or not the occasions depicted may occur in actual life.

The youngsters appropriately recognized unattainable occasions – like a personality strolling by means of partitions. However in addition they incorrectly rejected many occasions that had been merely unbelievable – like a personality ingesting onion juice, or proudly owning a lion as a pet (Shtulman and Carey 2007).

Equally, in experiments involving animated cartoons, Hui Li and her colleagues discovered proof that kids err on the facet of skepticism. “Even 4-year-olds have a reasonably good understanding of fantastical occasions in animated cartoons,” say the researchers. When these children make errors, it tends to be within the course of dismissing sensible occasions as unattainable (Li et al 2015).

The phenomenon might be noticed with non secular tales too.

In research of American kids from Christian properties, researchers discovered that 4-year-olds had been very skeptical of tales involving supernatural occasions and divine intervention (Wooley and Cox 2007; Vaden and Wooley 2011). Researchers didn’t see children take a extra accepting stance till they had been 5 or 6, maybe as a result of children this age usually tend to obtain express non secular instruction (Wooley and Ghossainy 2013).

So it isn’t that younger kids get issues mistaken, or can’t be persuaded to consider in improbable issues. They’ll. However experiments counsel we have now to actively sway them – present them with proof, or commerce on our grownup credibility to persuade kids {that a} improbable proposition is true (Subbotsky 1993; Boerger et al 2009).

If the fantasy is introduced as leisure, it isn’t very prone to encourage confusion – not, at any charge, to the form of confusion that might lead children to suppose that people can fly, or stroll by means of partitions, or flip themselves invisible.

However younger kids could wrestle with the fantasy versus actuality distinction if they’re very fearful

In research of preschoolers, children affected by continual, excessive ranges of fearfulness carry out extra poorly on fantasy-reality assessments. So if in case you have a younger baby who experiences extreme nighttime fears – or numerous daytime nervousness – your baby is extra vulnerable to consider that, say, a supernatural monster truly exists (Zisenwine et al 2013; Petkova and Cain 2017).

And preschoolers typically want sensible, down-to-earth eventualities.

Younger kids like to fake, however their playful adventures are sometimes fairly down-to-earth: They typically act out on a regular basis eventualities, or imitate mundane grownup behaviors — comparable to cooking a meal, or driving automobile. Equally — with regards to consuming works of fiction — preschoolers favor naturalistic tales. Given the selection, they have an inclination to want tales set in the actual world (Nyout and Lee 2022; Weisberg and Lee 2022).

Furthermore, it seems that fantasy tv (versus fantasy books, or fantasy, fake play) could have a brief, disruptive impact on the chief operate efficiency of youngsters underneath the age of 6.

Govt features are the psychological processes that assist us self-regulate. They embrace the skills to override impulses, keep centered, and observe info in working reminiscence. Additionally they embrace the capability to change flexibly in response to a change of guidelines.

What occurs to a toddler’s government features when she or he is watching an animated TV present that depicts improbable — typically unattainable — occasions? When researchers have proven preschoolers (aged 4-6 years) such TV applications, these children carried out worse on government operate duties instantly afterwards (Lillard et al 2015; Li et al 2020; Rhodes et al 2020; Fan et al 2021).

However the identical wasn’t true when adults learn the kids a fantasy story (Lilliard et al 2015). Nor does it seem that fantasy fake play is disruptive (quite the opposite, as you will note under). And seven-year-olds? These older children didn’t expertise any reductions in government operate efficiency after watching animated fantasy applications (Fan et al 2021).

So what’s happening with fantasy tv and younger kids? It isn’t completely clear. However one idea is that kids underneath the age of 6 have restricted cognitive sources for holding observe of all of the shocking, counter-factual issues that occur in improbable cartoon applications. The hassle is overtaxing, leaving them with fewer sources to carry out different government operate duties instantly afterwards (Fan et al 2021).

What about the concept that fantasy is a mere distraction? Is fantasy play simply senseless enjoyable? Is studying fantasy fiction a waste of time?

We’ve seen that sure varieties of fantasy — fantasy that’s scary, and fantasy that’s depicted in animated cartoons — could also be problematic for some preschoolers. Does this imply that the remainder of it’s okay? Some folks would possibly argue that fantasy is frivolous. That children — no matter their age — are higher off in the event that they focus all their consideration on the sensible, on a regular basis world. However research point out that fantasy can profit kids in a number of vital methods.

Watching a film with magical content material could stimulate creativity in school-aged kids.

The proof comes from experiments involving the movie, Harry Potter and the Thinker’s Stone. Eugene Subbotsky and colleagues started by measuring kids’s inventive tendencies. They requested 6- and 8-year-olds to attract photos of “humorous, loopy, unattainable” objects that “couldn’t exist in the actual world.” Additionally they challenged children to maneuver throughout a room in as many alternative methods as doable.

Subsequent, with these baseline measurements in hand, the researchers assigned every baby to see one in every of two 15-minute movie clips. Each clips got here from the film, Harry Potter and the Thinker’s Stone. However one clip featured numerous magical content material. The opposite — whereas simply as action-packed — featured solely naturalistic occasions.

Did the content material have any affect? To seek out out, Subbotsky’s workforce re-tested every baby’s skill to “suppose outdoors the field,” and the outcomes favored the youngsters who had watched the magical content material. These kids confirmed better features of their inventive pondering efficiency (Subbotsky et al 2010). 

Fantasy fiction could encourage preschoolers to study new phrases.

How do we all know? Deena Skolnick-Weisberg and her colleagues recruited greater than 150 children to take part in a preschool-based intervention. They assigned all the kids to take part in day by day, 20-minute lengthy classes of storytelling and fake play. However there have been two completely different situations.

Half the youngsters had been assigned to the low-fantasy situation, which launched new vocabulary phrases within the context of storybooks and fake play that emphasised sensible occasions. These kids encountered some fantasy parts (i.e., anthropomorphic animals that may speak). However the conditions had been comparatively mundane (e.g., engaged on a farm, or making a pot of soup).

The opposite half had been assigned to the high-fantasy situation, which launched to new vocabulary phrases within the context of storybooks and fake play that featured completely imaginary creatures and occasions – like dragons hatching from breakfast eggs.

Earlier than the brand new classes started, the researchers examined kids’s vocabulary data. Then, after 8 days of the intervention, the youngsters had been examined once more. And there was a distinction between teams: Children within the high-fantasy situation used extra new vocabulary of their spontaneous speech (Skolnick-Weisberg et al 2015).

Fantasy, fake play would possibly assist preschoolers develop government operate expertise and the power to learn feelings

It is smart that faux, fantasy play may assist children hone their government operate expertise. To play efficiently with others, it’s important to hold a brand new algorithm in your head. You should keep centered, and keep away from saying or doing issues that might spoil the shared fantasy. It’s essential be good at task-switching, juggling info in working reminiscence, and self-regulation.

It’s additionally believable that sure sorts of fantasy play may improve a toddler’s understanding of different folks’s feelings. Imagining alternate realities could also be good apply for imagining what goes on in one other particular person’s head (Dore and Lillard 2015).

What does the analysis inform us? Correlational research verify hyperlinks between fantasy, government operate, and emotional savvy. For instance:

  • When researchers examined greater than 100 preschoolers, they discovered that youngsters with a wealthy fantasy life tended to carry out higher on duties that required them to shift from one algorithm to a different (Pierrucci et al 2013).
  • A follow-up research on one other group of preschoolers discovered that fantasy-prone kids exhibited higher emotional regulation expertise than their friends, even after accounting for different elements, like a toddler’s language skill (Gilpin et al 2015).
  • Different analysis has reported associations between fantasy and emotional understanding. In a research of first and second graders, children who engaged in additional cognitively refined fantasy play tended to be extra savvy concerning the feelings of others (Seja and Russ 1999). And a research of preschoolers discovered that youngsters had been extra likey to develop superior “mind-reading” expertise if that they had a robust orientation in direction of fantasy (Dore and Lillard 2015).

There’s experimental proof, too. Current research counsel that we are able to enhance a side of government operate — working reminiscence efficiency — by encouraging kids to interact in fake play.

For instance, Rachel Thibodeau and her colleagues randomly assigned 110 preschoolers (between the ages of three and 5) to one in every of three teams:

  • one third of the youngsters had been assigned to day by day, adult-guided classes of fake, fantasy play (e.g., let’s be birds!)
  • one other group participated in guided classes of non-fantasy video games (like enjoying ball), and
  • the remaining kids skilled “enterprise as regular” at their preschools – no particular play classes.

After 5 weeks, kids within the fake play group made important features in working reminiscence efficiency. Children within the different two teams didn’t (Thibodeau et al 2016). And when the researchers drilled down – evaluating particular person kids within the fake play group – they discovered a dosage impact. The extra intensely a toddler engaged in fake, fantasy play, the better his or her enchancment by the top of the research.

It isn’t clear that the improbable parts of fake play had been essential for enhancing working reminiscence efficiency. In a more moderen research of 3-year-olds, researchers discovered that it was the act of pretending collectively that mattered most — not how imaginative or improbable the storyline was (White and Carlson 2021). However fantasy tales is likely to be useful if they supply children with the motivation to interact in fake play.

There are limits, although, sure? Certainly it’s not useful to attempt to use fantasy to show children about science or problem-solving in the actual world…

Researchers Emily Hopkins and Angeline Lillard name this the “Magic Schoolbus Dilemma”, a reference to a preferred animated cartoon that makes an attempt to show science classes by means of tales that embrace fantasy parts — like a faculty bus able to altering it’s form and measurement.

As we’ve famous above, younger kids might be hyperskeptical about fantasy tales — dismissing even these components of a narrative which might be merely unbelievable — not unattainable. So we’d anticipate that youngsters can be much less prone to study new information introduced in fantasy tales. And several other experimental research have confirmed this (see summaries in Strouse et al 2018; Hopkins and Lillard 2021).

But even right here, there’s motive to suppose that fantasy would possibly typically be useful. In an experiment performed on 5-year-olds, Hopkins and Lillard introduced children with the answer to a sensible drawback by embedding it in a narrative. Some kids heard a model of the story that was minimally improbable (set on a planet that was depicted as being nearly similar to earth). Different children heard a model that included “deeper” fantasy parts (like orange grass and a inexperienced sky).

Children in each teams had been uncovered to the identical covert lesson about problem-solving. However the kids who had encountered this info within the extra improbable story had been extra prone to apply the lesson in a subsequent, real-life check. Curiously, this distinction emerged solely if the extra improbable story additionally depicted some really unattainable occasions (like a personality strolling by means of partitions), and solely if these unattainable occasions had been introduced earlier than the academic content material within the story (Hopkins and Lillard 2021).

What was happening right here? Perhaps these unattainable occasions attracted kids’s curiosity — making children pay nearer consideration. And maybe these 5-year olds had been mature sufficient to essentially get pleasure from fantasy, and to understand that the following, sensible, problem-solving content material may very well be utilized to on a regular basis life. We’ll want extra analysis to kind this out. In the meantime, it appears untimely to imagine that youngsters can’t study information introduced in tales with improbable content material. It would depend upon a toddler’s age, pursuits, and reasoning expertise.

The takeaway?

Fantasy isn’t all the time interesting — or acceptable — for younger kids. They could discover sure fantasy parts scary, or exhausting to trace. However this doesn’t imply that younger kids ought to keep away from all types of fantasy.

Quite the opposite, preschoolers who have interaction in fake, fantasy play have a tendency to indicate stronger government operate expertise. Fantasy tales could encourage children to study new vocabulary and new information. And — amongst older kids, not less than — we have now proof that fantasy films can encourage inventive pondering.

There’s nothing frivolous or impractical about these advantages. But practicality isn’t every thing. Fantasy can be vital even with out these results. It’s a supply of enjoyment and inspiration. It permits us to see issues from new views. It may possibly vastly increase our expertise of life.

So we don’t want particular instructional justifications to indulge a toddler’s sense of fantasy. They’re merely icing on the cake. We owe kids fantasy in the identical means that we owe them music, humor, science, philosophy, and artwork. It’s a part of our inheritance as a large-brained, inventive species. It’s our youngsters’s birthright.

Extra studying

How else can we assist kids study? Take a look at these Parenting Science articles.


References: The advantages of fantasy fiction and imaginative play

Boerger EA. 2011. ‘In fairy tales fairies can disappear’: kids’s reasoning concerning the traits of people and fantasy figures. Br J Dev Psychol. 29(Pt 3):635-55.

Dore RA and Lillard AS. 2015. Principle of thoughts and kids’s engagement in fantasy worlds. Creativeness, Cognition and Persona. 34(3): 230–242.

Gilpin AT, Brown MM, and Pierucci JM. 2015. Relations between fantasy orientation and emotion regulation in preschool. Early Training and Improvement 26(7): 920-932.

Hopkins EJ and Lillard AS. 2021. The Magic Faculty Bus dilemma: How fantasy impacts kids’s studying from tales. J Exp Little one Psychol. 210:105212.

Li H, Boguszewski Ok, and Lillard AS. 2015. Can that actually occur? Youngsters’s data concerning the actuality standing of fantastical occasions in tv.J Exp Little one Psychol. 139:99-114.

Li H, Hsueh Y, Yu H, Kitzmann KM. 2020. Viewing Fantastical Occasions in Animated Tv Exhibits: Instant Results on Chinese language Preschoolers’ Govt Operate. Entrance Psychol. 11:583174.

Nyhout A and Lee R. 2022. Younger kids will not be pushed to discover imaginary worlds. Behav Mind Sci. 45:e291.

Petkova AV, Cain KM. 2017. Preschool Fantasy-Actuality Discrimination: Influences of Trait and Primed Fearfulness. J Genet Psychol. 178(2):133-138.

Pierucci JM, O’Brien CT, McInnis MA, Gilpin AT and Barber, AB. 2014. Fantasy orientation constructs and associated government operate growth in preschool: Developmental advantages to government features by being a fantasy-oriented baby. Worldwide Journal of Behavioral Improvement 38(1): 62–69.

Seja AL, Russ SW. Youngsters’s fantasy play and emotional understanding. J Clin Little one Psychol. 1999 Jun;28(2):269-77.

Shtulman A and Carey S. 2007. Unbelievable or unattainable? How kids motive about the potential for extraordinary occasions. Little one Dev. 2007 Might-Jun;78(3):1015-32.

Strouse GA, Nyhout A, Ganea PA. 2018. The Position of E-book Options in Younger Youngsters’s Switch of Data from Image Books to Actual-World Contexts. Entrance Psychol. 9:50.

Subbotsky E, Hysted C, Jones N. 2010. Watching movies with magical content material facilitates creativity in kids. Percept Mot Expertise 111(1):261-77.

Subbotsky E and Slater E. 2011. Youngsters’s discrimination of improbable vs. sensible visible shows after watching a movie with magical content material. Percept Mot Expertise. 112(2):603-9.

Thibodeau RB, Gilpin AT, Brown MM, Meyer BA. 2016. The consequences of fantastical pretend-play on the event of government features: An intervention research. J Exp Little one Psychol. 145:120-38.

Vaden VC and Woolley JD. 2011. Does God make it actual? Youngsters’s perception in non secular tales from the Judeo-Christian custom. Little one Dev. 82(4):1120-35.

Weisberg DS, Ilgaz H, Hirsh-Pasek Ok, Golinkoff RM, Nicolopoulou A and Dickinson DK. 2015. Shovels and swords: How sensible and fantastical themes have an effect on kids’s phrase studying. Cognitive Improvement, 35, 1-14.

Weisberg DS and Sobel DM. 2022. Imaginative processes in kids will not be significantly imaginative. Behav Mind Sci. 45:e303.

Woolley JD and Cox V. 2007. Improvement of beliefs about storybook actuality. Developmental Science. 10:681–693.

Woolley JD and E Ghossainy M. 2013. Revisiting the fantasy-reality distinction: kids as naïve skeptics. Little one Dev. 84(5):1496-510.

Zisenwine T, Kaplan M, Kushnir J, Sadeh A. 2013. Nighttime fears and fantasy-reality differentiation in preschool kids. Little one Psychiatry Hum Dev. 44(1):186-99.

picture of lady in cape by Choreograph / istock

Content material final modified 1/2023. Parts of the textual content derive from an earlier model of this text, written by the identical creator.